Mr. Chair, I'll ask Mr. Bevan or Dr. Wendy Watson-Wright to augment this, and I think we'll probably have to come back with details on paper to the committee.
I was in the department as the associate deputy minister when.... It wasn't a direct relationship with the Pacific Salmon Treaty, but it was in the same timeframe as we were negotiating the Pacific Salmon Treaty. I think it was about a $400-million overall scenario that played out, with second post-TAGS playing out east, and a good chunk of that money was dedicated to habitat restoration. I think a good bit of that has sunset, but certainly we're continuing to invest in habitat west.
In fact, next week at this committee I think we're providing a presentation on the environmental process modernization thing, which is related to how we do that in the most effective way possible.
I'll ask my colleagues to flesh out the answer, but I think I would like to go back to the decision in the timeframe that the honourable member's asking about, because that was then and now is now. But there is a story that we do owe the committee, and it's a really good question, actually.