Just quickly, on the Larocque decision, and in relation to Mr. Cuzner's question, when you speak to fishermen there's always a discrepancy here. The people who used to get fish from DFO in order to do science thought it was a great thing; all the rest of the fishermen who didn't get fish to do science thought it was a terrible thing. We are looking at that issue as a committee.
Can you tell me what information you get from directing a fishery in an area where there's no fish--something that the fishermen can tell you before you send them--versus the information you get from keeping proper logbooks on species distribution and having an on-site observer or fisheries biologist on board?