I thank you for the question.
You've just provided probably the first glimpse of some sanity into how we can manage our fisheries on an ongoing basis. There are many models out there that are results-based, instead of rules-based.
I used to be in the forest sector in B.C. We had a rules-based model that sort of assumed that everybody who cut a tree was going to destroy the environment. So they papered you over with countless reams of regulations that ripped over a billion dollars out of the sector.
Or you can go with results-based, where you say that these are clearly the required outcomes, and you will manage towards those outcomes. You give rewards for proper outcomes, and you give heavy penalties. You make them more prescriptive, more rules-based for non-compliance.
There are models out there that I think you would have industry pay for. If industry were actually managing the resources to objectives set by governments in a clear matrix, with consequences, you would see the industry primarily stepping up to the plate.
There are good ones in New Zealand and Australia that you could look at.