I only wanted to clarify the $24 million versus the $12 million. The $24 million was the total of all the collaborative arrangements where the industry was contributing. The industry was contributing in some cases in kind, in cash, or in fish. So of the $24 million, $12 million was determined to have been contributed from the use of fish. The $24 million was everything else. So there is not a $24 million shortfall.
On May 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.