Thank you.
Mr. Doubleday, you indicated in your slide here that allocations previously used to fund collaborative arrangements had been returned to fishers. That's what it says.
Mr. Robert Haché appeared before us the other day, and he said, regarding the decision in area 12 in 2006, that 1,000 tonnes of crab had been allocated, and they've asked DFO to give the money back to the licence holders because of the Martineau judgment. The judge had clearly said the quota was taken away for science purposes and that the quota should be given back to the fishermen. We've asked the department to give that back to the fishermen, to the licence holders. There was a question on what the response was, and he said they're holding the money and now they have to go to court to get the money.
In your slide here you said that it was returned, that allocations previously used had been returned to the fishers. Can you explain why Mr. Haché and his group haven't received those funds or allocations back yet?