I think the question will remain whether the allocation of fish to arrive at those collaborative arrangements is a good thing or not, but that will be under debate, for sure.
Principle 5 of the general policies principles in your policy document says: “...seek to develop collaborative arrangements...in order to reduce the direct costs to government and to maximize program effectiveness and responsiveness.” There are two quite different things, I think. One is about saving the government money and one is about doing it better. I think there is a suspicion that we entered into more and more collaborative arrangements as the funding pressures grew, and it really wasn't about doing it any better, it was about saving the government money.
Do you have a comment on that?