You seem to be in favour of updating the Fisheries Act. In my view, the only problem with the Act is that it is over a hundred year's old. Aren't you afraid that Bill C-45 will contain all of the decisions that went against DFO? I am referring to the decision brought down in the Larocque case, where service and research were being funded with crabbers' money.
Aren't you afraid that Bill C-45 might allow DFO to demand quotas to fund research and development?