Understood, and I would imagine that there are specific ports of entry where foreign vessels are supposed to tie up. I'm just saying from a legal perspective or from a national security perspective, I guess it's always possible that somebody with the wrong intentions could utilize one of these. It's just a question I have. I'm not suggesting that it is happening or anything like that. I appreciate it. It's just a curiosity question, Mr. Chair.
The other question I have is maybe about getting a little bit more clarification. I know Monsieur Carrier brought it up. I was just curious about how you define a core fishing harbour versus a non-core. I'm just wondering, is it based on usage and is it based on commercial fishing? Or is it based on the needs of the aquaculture industry in the area? Is it based on the needs of sport fishing or recreational fishing, getting goods and services out to lodges and so on?
I'm wondering from that perspective if you could give me a little more clarification as to how the department has made the determination.