We are aware of the costs of recurring dredging, in view of the fact that we get the impression that it's like throwing money into the water. So we're very sensitive to that; that's for sure.
Last week, a group of engineers met and analyzed the situation in an attempt to see whether there were other ways of doing things. Obviously, each case is different. Climatic conditions and geography differ from place to place. We are sensitive to the fact that that's expensive. You have to look at the costs and benefits of breakwaters before determining whether maintenance dredging should be set aside. It's a case-by-case issue.
We also have to say that, for each case, we conduct technical analyses, wave disturbance analyses and analyses of the technical costs associated with that approach. They have to be considered among the overall costs. That's what we do when we study each case, in order to determine the best long-term option for serving the fishing clientele.