To contribute to that, I think it points to a need for good planning. You can't overemphasize the need for having good planning--having the upfront work done; recognizing that the fiscal year cycle and the project conception to implementation cycle doesn't really all fit within one fiscal year. So any project has multiple fiscal years almost inevitably. You need emphasis on doing the necessary field work; understanding user requirements as effectively as we can; having the necessary structural condition work, soil work, geotechnical surveys, sounding surveys, wave studies, and all that stuff done upfront.
You have to remember too that significant time is inserted into the project implementation cycle by the regulatory process--I'm not speaking ill of it, but it's a fact of doing business--whether it's the required environmental screenings, approvals under the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Fisheries Act, habitat provisions that have to be complied with. There could be ocean dumping in a permit. There could be gazetting in the Canada Gazette, public notices on certain things, provincial regulations that we comply with. So the lead time into a project is very significant.