Not neglected, but there probably could be more attention paid to them. For instance, there's a priority ranking system with respect to projects, and certainly harbour activity is a factor there. And the smaller ones, without as much activity, would perhaps not rank as highly. Once again, it's about balance. Sometimes if the activity is not that high, but if the needs are relatively modest or enter in the big scale of things, then perhaps a business case can be made.
We have cases where a harbour perhaps has facilities that are at the end of their life and there's an alternative nearby. You probably won't be familiar with the Frenchman's Cove and Garnish situation. I know it's a big stretch to move to another location, but when you look at the.... If the needs of the harbour that was divested were relatively modest compared to the level of activity there, maybe there would have been a business case for retaining it in the inventory. So I think--