I just have a final question.
In Canada, as pointed out already, we have an interesting system where the federal government takes responsibility, but we don't centralize that. We decentralize into the five regions, but we continue to maintain ownership by the federal government of the core small craft harbours. We expect the harbour authority to manage those on our behalf as best they can. I'm curious as to what you personally think of that model.
I think on the one hand you could say it's the best of all worlds, but perhaps you could also make a case that it's the worst of all worlds. We give the responsibility but not the ownership to the harbour authorities. Perhaps the argument could be made that they might approach the job differently if they actually had to own it. I'm wondering what you think about that.