One element of witness testimony we heard last week was that our witnesses—who had very strong points of view about this—visited the site with DFO habitat officials, and they were asked to reveal redds at the site where the witnesses, the private citizens, had examined the destruction of redds. It was alluded that if any live fish were discovered among those redds, charges could have been laid against the witnesses for disturbing salmon habitat and destroying fish.
Could you tell me if that was a possibility and if that was under consideration?