Thank you for clarifying that for us. Because time is short I'll move right on to this other issue about water.
Engineering is challenging, especially with something the size of the Fraser River and dewatering concern challenges. You mentioned risks, and we understand certainly that all risks have to be compared with other risks in a risk-benefit analysis, obviously. But the estimate that there were millions of fry that were killed—I think the estimate was something like two million based on the redds they examined and so on—is that, in your opinion, an accurate assessment?
In the overall scope we know that pink are very prolific, as I understand it, being a two-year fish and low end. The river does change, water levels are coming and going, which is why you evaluate them. Is that an accurate assessment of the number of fry that might have been lost? In perspective of how many young fry there might be in the river system, what percentage are we talking about here?