Yes, very quickly.
The contractor placed the causeway, and the plan was to then take out a section from either side and lower in an 18-foot bridge, not a very large bridge. The main reason for the bridge was navigable waters, to allow the passage of, for instance, a kayak or a canoe. At that time, the contractor advised us he was unable to do that because of the bridge and the water and the velocity. He said if anyone does come by, they'll get sucked under there, and possibly killed. So at that time they decided not to put the bridge in.
Paul mentioned the velocity earlier. It's deeper here than normal for most crossings, quite a bit deeper, and the velocity was higher and that was taking away the gravel base, so actually the bridge could have failed as well.
So that was his call for his insurance purposes.