I would like to respond to that final remark, if I may.
I think in all the things we do.... We carry out a series of actions, we make decisions in hundreds and thousands of cases, and we have to make assumptions in almost all those cases before we take the action. So we make assumptions about how fish are going to behave. In this case, we make assumptions about water flow. We make assumptions about dewatering or not dewatering. All those are assumptions and then we make a decision. As a department, a responsible institution, we make assumptions. If some of those assumptions turn out to be valid, we make corrections in the future.
In my view, it's a proactive approach that acknowledges that we learn as we go. In this case, as we've indicated, we believe we took responsible measures for our decisions. That being said, we did see effects we had not anticipated. We need to learn from those effects and we need to make changes in the future.