The issue I'm wondering about is our conservation-based fishery. We have a total allowable catch in every species; we don't have a huge foreign fishery inside our 200-mile limit. I'm not quite certain why our treatment of port infrastructure.... It's not all port infrastructure; it's strictly fisheries infrastructure, and there is a fair amount of existing private infrastructure that the government has no investment in whatsoever. Why would that be treated as a subsidy to the fishery, when the fishery's conservation-based?
Is that an argument?