I want you to discuss a little bit about the subjective issues that could be open for interpretation by the WTO, specifically environmental concerns.
Take, for example, a circumstance whereby a body of scientific evidence exists, within the Department of Fisheries and Oceans here in Canada, alleging that the overall population health and the stock assessment is marginal or poor, but the Government of Canada decides to allow a commercial fishery on that stock. Notwithstanding the actual truth of the matter--the body of scientific evidence existing showing that the stock is marginal--could that decision be challenged by another country, especially one that participates in a transboundary fishery of the same stock?