Thank you very much.
Uruguay's ambassador put this text together on November 30, 2007, and I find I'm having a hard time grasping this. Previous testimony talked about quite a number of countries, including EU countries and Japan, that support our position on some of these things, like port infrastructure and not subsidies, and we believe we're going to be able to get these folks onside.
I'm puzzled. When an ambassador puts together a working document that presents a possible compromise and this many countries appear to be in line with our position, who's on the other side of this position who could really put us in a tough spot? I would like to understand who that is. Do we really think we're going to lose the situation on this text?