Sometimes we would pay them directly to do it, so it was in fact contracted services, and on occasion it involved services in kind on our behalf, i.e., we would provide the scientists on board or the equipment necessary. Those involving the use of fish—i.e., the critical component of the Larocque decision, which was that we could not use fish as a means of covering the expenses for the surveys—was what we provided you.
We will provide you with the others by the end of this month, but frankly, they do not include the use of fish. The agreements were in fact contractual agreements that included funding on our behalf or in-kind services. This is why we interpreted your question—and my apologies if that was not the intent of the question—as dealing with the use of fish specifically, which is what we provided the committee.