I guess the other thing that certainly would be important is the difference between the various areas that still maintain a significant fishery and areas where the fishery is not as important--now aquaculture may be replacing some of that in certain areas--but on a cost-benefit analysis of exactly where the wharfs are needed the most and where the fishery is most significant. That's not to take away from areas that have important fisheries, but where is the money best spent? Have we ever looked at this on that basis?
