Thank you, Mr. Chair.
To stay on this topic for a moment, the importance is the list. The importance is who sits on this committee that's advising the government as to where the priorities should go.
Is there any advice that you would offer, if you had the minister in front of you now, in terms of how to construct the group of people who would make those final recommendations, and whether there are any critical criteria that might be perhaps counterintuitive? We know national historical importance and those types of things, but are there any criteria that you think might be important, and all historical applications would have to pass through this lens? In the bill itself, I can't read any detail that really directs the government one way or another as to how to make that advisory committee, and what, if any, criteria that committee should use.
So if you were to offer advice to the government, what would it be?