You'll create an official process as opposed to an informal process, and I think that needs to be done.
I think there's an enormous importance in legitimizing this relationship, which probably is not there now. This kind of legitimization is largely symbolic, but symbols can be extremely important. It means this is real and this is a relationship the government recognizes. It also creates a legal framework for that to happen.
On the west coast particularly, I think what will happen is that it's going to galvanize people, because right now there's a sleepy attitude about lighthouses on the west coast. Of the 56 lighthouses I have on my list--there's also one historically on one of the interior lakes--half of them are still staffed and the other half are mostly still operational, at least as beacons, and a lot of them are more out of sight than out of mind. The people of B.C. assume things are moving along, and I think there's a lot of latent interest in these places. There's certainly a lot of interest in history and heritage.
So when we see this bill passed, I think people will take action, because the bill contains some time horizons. It has milestones, and you have to respond to it. It's not a bill that puts something passive in place; it creates an active process. So that will be, I think, of great importance and value.