Well, if I can just add to that, the way I see this, Mr. Blais, is that if these heritage lighthouses are given over to a community group for maintenance and operation, if it's a tourist attraction and there has to be a wharf or some type of access facility, it would be much more costly if that access--whether it's a wharf, whether it's a road, whatever type of physical improvement is needed to provide access--had to be maintained in a heritage format. It would be much more onerous for whatever community group took over the operation of that heritage lighthouse.
I see this as an opportunity to create a little bit more success for those groups by allowing them to keep modern structures and modern access facilities open, yet still give the act the authority it needs to maintain the relevant structures, which are the lighthouse and any of the outbuildings that might be relevant to the long-term operation of that lighthouse, in their heritage state.
So for me, I think this is a good thing in terms of keeping costs down and giving these lighthouses every opportunity to be successful as heritage lighthouses.