Yes, let me take a shot at it.
As it currently reads, the light station has a number of structures on it, one of which is the lighthouse, but there are other buildings sometimes, as Mr. Keddy has explained. There are also other structures like wharves and helipads and so on. So the intent of this amendment is to restrict, through the statutory obligation, that heritage level to just those buildings, rather than all the things that would be considered structures.
The next amendment flushes it out a little bit more. If you look at amendment G-3, we're explaining what “related building” means more clearly. I think the intent is to narrow the scope of the bill, which in my opinion is a good thing.