No. Isn't the subsequent round to be opposition, government, opposition, government, opposition, government?
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
February 3rd, 2009 / 12:30 p.m.
An hon. member
No. Isn't the subsequent round to be opposition, government, opposition, government, opposition, government?
See context to find out what was said next.