The problem I see with any of the changes is that we sat here before and put all this formula together. We found previously that when the presenters came in, they had 10 minutes, which can run 12 or 13 minutes, which means you have, in a one-hour presentation, about one-quarter of the time used by the presenter. It cuts in on the time.
My thought would be that if you shift to 15 minutes, that would be great, but you only have an hour, and there's lots of dialogue between the different parties and the presenter. I would like to leave it the way it is. We fought hard to get this into a reasonably acceptable mode. We find that if the presenters go on too long, you just don't get time enough to ask questions.
The way it's set up seems to have worked pretty well. Perhaps somebody wants a minute or two more or something like that, but I think overall the chair has been reasonably generous over the period. I expect that this chair could be too. But if we get into shifting this back and forth.... I think it was a lot of work putting it the way it is, it has worked reasonably well, and I would support that.