I guess I would just say that if we do proceed with the status quo, then we would certainly expect all honourable members of this committee to act honourably and not blindside, because the wording of this says “business then under consideration”. It doesn't say it was ever on an agenda. It just says it was under consideration. It got on the floor in some way. There's a whole variety of means that could then lead to a legal substantive motion. That's what would concern us, of course. If the business under consideration were planned business, if it said “to planned business then under consideration”, I would feel more comfortable with that.
In either case, however we proceed with this, we expect everyone to act respectfully. I think that has happened in the past. It's hard to define what a substantive motion is, and it's also hard to define what “under consideration” means, how it got on the floor at the time.
Those are our concerns, Mr. Chair.