In my opinion, this formula should not be changed for several reasons. The first is purely parliamentary, whether it's the main committee or the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure. In fact, simply to reassure Mr. John Weston regarding his question, let me point out on the one hand that the subcommittee in question deals with all the subjects given to it by the standing committee, and on the other hand, the word “agenda” has to be understood in the broadest sense of the term. As you know, there are electoral agendas, but here we're not talking about that. It's more an issue of our working agenda. In that sense, it's understood in the broader sense.
I think we shouldn't change the way we're doing things right now because I feel it's a winning formula. It allows us to represent all the strengths that exist within the main committee. In other words, each of the political parties is well represented and it is fully represented. Moreover, we've seen that in these conditions, the government is represented by two people out of a total of five, which is not the case for the Bloc Québécois or the Liberal Party. In my opinion, that faithfully represents the current Parliament, and it allows for very good cooperation for our work and shows a good attitude of openness. I hope that this will be maintained by the government party because it allows for the participation of representatives from each of the political parties.