So Mr. Kamp's amendment is to remove this wording from the previous motion: “unless the substantive motion relates directly to the business then under consideration”. Is that correct?
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
February 3rd, 2009 / 11:50 a.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston
So Mr. Kamp's amendment is to remove this wording from the previous motion: “unless the substantive motion relates directly to the business then under consideration”. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.