Yes, I think I understand that. I think mostly what we've heard this morning is sort of on the value side, and we've heard about some accomplishments and so on. We're not questioning the value. I think we need to be assured of the value-for-money side of the equation, and so far I haven't heard an acknowledgment that maybe we could have done things a little differently or maybe we should do things differently in the future.
I think we would want to ask that question and see if there's a process in place to conduct the kind of review that would assure us and assure all taxpayers that we're getting good value for the money. Maybe there's a way to spend less money and still achieve that value. If there isn't, I understand the expenses were within guidelines, but I think the question is whether there is anything even within the department—and I understand much of it is set by the Treasury Board. But within the department are those guidelines being looked at to ensure they spend as reasonably as possible?