As I mentioned, we have a list of issues that are facing our fishery. They are issues that require action, and my opinion is that the industry should be dealing with these issues, but when we talk about eco-labelling, traceability, quality of product, overcapacity, compliance, carbon footprint, or species at risk at a big table, we get a diversity of opinions.
Some of these are conservation issues. The department feels that it is their mandate to protect conservation first, so they will make the decision on conservation. However, something like fuel cost is a business decision. If we want to try to get a change in the fishing plan that would reduce fuel cost, that is a business decision, and if somebody says that everything is fine the way it is, then we can't move ahead. We can't address that issue because we don't have 100%. If one person says he has a 700-horsepower engine and can get to the fishing grounds three minutes faster than other people and therefore doesn't want any changes made, then that's a veto, as far as I'm concerned.