Well, for a decision-making process in a competitive fishery—and you may have heard of the study that came out recently that there'll be no competitive fisheries after 2050. They'll all be gone, except ITQ, and in my opinion the reason is that an ITQ has an owner and he can make a business decision.
When you have a group of competitors in a room, they cannot make a business decision. In our advisory capacity, DFO has defined consensus as 100% agreement. I think the minister somehow has to make it so we can make a decision and have input into decisions, more so than just offering an opinion at the table. When you get 10 different opinions, it isn't right for the minister to have to choose one to make a decision on; then basically decisions don't get made. We have to find a mechanism.
But the minister, constitutionally, has the right, so it's up to the minister to devolve some decision-making authority to boards or whatever if we're going to retain a competitive fishery. Personally, I favour a competitive fishery, but I agree entirely: if they cannot find a mechanism to make a decision, they will lose their positions to ITQs, because those guys can make decisions.