Thank you, Minister.
I think the study revealed that changing the single desk, because of the market and the way it was constructed, was probably not the most optimal way, but it did allow the FFMC and pointed out that a number of pilot projects could be tried with different organizations. And we have been working with the organization to see if there are some pilots that could be undertaken, so that we can test some of the different market options.
The other thing, too, is that we have and will shortly engage the provinces, because they're the ones that actually have the seats on the board. If they don't initiate the discussions and the changes.... We're not the ones who direct the structure of the organization. It really is up to the standing members of the board, which is made up of the provincial and territorial representatives. We will engage in more formal discussions with them and the FFMC to get a better sense.... We hear anecdotally, but we would really want to get a sense from the provincial representatives and territorial representatives, and the harvesters as well who also sit on the board, where the direction should be at this point.
So we've had a variety of views, but we haven't had a formal process, if I can put it that way. We've had reports, we've had the FFMC strategic plan; the next step for us is to work with the FFMC, with the jurisdictions and the harvesters who are on the board.