Since ACOA began, or over the course of our activities, one of the approaches we have taken in working with industries, industry associations, or groups within industries has been to identify particular initiatives--and usually they would identify them--where, if the industry were able to cause that to happen, it would be a good thing for the industry and everybody would benefit.
ACOA's approach has always been to provide seed capital or upfront capital, to provide money to get organizations through the early stages of their start-up, so that the good work they intend to do or hope to do can be recognized by those who are benefiting from it. Over time, then, those who are directly benefiting from it--and also if government departments with a specific mandate were able to benefit from it--would take on more of the cost of undertaking the activity.
There has always been a requirement toward a sustainability model, or else it becomes something the government has to do forever, and if that's the case, then it probably should be a government-owned structure as opposed to a third party structure. But again, I think the point is that when ACOA gets involved in something, whether it's the tourism association or something in the fishery, generally you do it for a while, but you hand it over to the industry once the industry has seen the value in undertaking it.