On this $100 million investment that you're talking about, you seem to say you don't think it should go towards a buy-out as such. Would it just be an infusion to allow the fishermen to get through this year? What investment, other than to subsidize the fishermen for this particular one year, would that $100 million cover? I'd like you to talk a little bit more about the rationalization, because we've been hearing many times that it's important to get some people out of the industry so that those who are left in the industry can make a reasonable living in the years to come.
On May 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.