First, I'd have great difficulty in speculating or endeavouring to impute what the purposes or the intent of the EU folks were in terms of coming to the negotiation of the new NAFO convention, but I would say this inclusion in this convention is similar to what exists in other international regional fisheries organization conventions, such as the one that governs fisheries on the eastern Atlantic.
I could also read that in combination with the other points that are laid out in the convention, that talk about the rights of the coastal state, that affirm the sovereignty of the coastal state, that make reference to NAFO operating within the regulatory area, and that this provision is just another explanation to others that, by the way, there is nothing in this that would have anything to do with inside the Canadian zone unless Canada asked for it and voted for it. It's just another way of reaffirming that. It's also--