But if it's also on the nose and the tail of the Grand Banks, under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, UNCLOS, Canada has jurisdiction over the management of sedentary species for the full extent of our continental shelf.
If NAFO is now imposing a ban on auto-trawling, on bottom-dragging, to protect sedentary species, Canada already has jurisdiction for the management of sedentary species on the full extent of the nose and the tail of the continental shelf, even beyond 200 miles. What you're saying to me, then, is that NAFO has adopted a measure that will impose a management regime, a restriction on auto-trawling, bottom-dragging, on certain areas of the nose and the tail of the Grand Banks. This is clearly a Canadian jurisdiction. Sedentary species are a Canadian jurisdiction when they exist on the nose and the tail of the continental shelf. Can you elaborate on that? Can you verify it, deny it? Do the restrictions on auto-trawling, bottom-dragging, occur in certain areas of the continental shelf of Canada?