Right, but they're part of the process, not at the table but as part of the advisory role to the Canadian government lead negotiators who are there.
In that role, if there were reservations that the advisers were having as part of that process, it seems rather odd to me that.... What were their terms of reference for reporting back to the Province of Newfoundland if they were having issues with what was going on there? Surely, part of their role as advisers is to advise you, to say, “Minister, holy God, we don't like this. What the hell is going on?”