In your comments, Mr. Brodie, you said that NEAFC, for example, in the northeast Atlantic doesn't have the equivalent of the Scientific Council. It instead kind of contracts out its science work to an external body--ICES, I think, in this case.
What do you think about that? Do you think there would be some benefit in NAFO considering that? Do you think there are some downsides, perhaps, in having in-house science work? I know there are benefits as well, but in having the commission, the managers, and the scientists all working together, are there some downsides? Would there be some benefits to having some independence on the science side perhaps?