I think it's in your mind, because again I say, as I responded to a question from the other side of the table, that I did write that letter, obviously, and I'm willing to stand behind it. But you're looking at...to use the word “seems”, it is not what it seems to be. Basically, I made a statement that I couldn't believe that a country would allow any intrusion on their sovereignty, and to have it done by a minister without any recourse to cabinet or otherwise is just unacceptable.
From that point in time, again as we said, we did a re-analysis of where we were, and I tell you, it's not palatable for us to support the conventions. That's as simple and straightforward as we can possibly make it.