With regard to the objection procedure, there is some work done on process, but it still leads to the same thing. There can be objections, and these objections can be carried out over a period of time, but during the objection procedure, countries can still put on a unilateral quota and fish that quota, and even after a decision is made it's not binding.
So again, it's toothless as far as we're concerned. It's a little bit better in that there's a process, but no better in that the end result is that it's not binding and then it has to go to another body somewhere down the road. In the time all of that takes, a country can do great damage to any particular stock.
As for the strengthening, you say that these conventions are strengthened. Again, we don't see that this strengthens them in any way. As a matter of fact, especially with regard to the possibility of our sovereignty being breached, it weakens us.