Okay. No, no, that's just it, because we can get into a long argument as to why they're wrong, but if your testament is that they're wrong, that's fine. That's an opinion and it's yours, and it's good to state that, because that way we don't have to fool around mincing words here.
You also indicated—and I just say this as a sidebar to it—that you're concerned about the sustainability of the fish resource, not necessarily the safety aspect of it. I'm just paraphrasing you now. Surely your council would have serious concerns regarding mercury levels of tuna and swordfish, in those regards, I would assume, because those are serious safety issues for consumers throughout the world, right? I just wanted to give you a chance to correct that. You obviously would have concerns about those levels as well, wouldn't you?