Okay, this will be my last question for you, because he's going to cut me off very soon.
My view of custodial management was always, quite simply, that the nose and tail of the Grand Banks are attached to the continental shelf, and there are always legal arguments whether or not we could ever expand the 200-mile limit to include that. Those are legal arguments that I don't have the capability of arguing properly. However, the “always” point was that we would have fish quotas assured by NAFO, whatever the quota is. When the Portuguese, Spanish, or whoever come in, fish the quota, we would go on board the vessel, monitor the thing, make sure everything is according to what they're supposed to have, and if everything is according to Hoyle, off they go. If not, they're into St. John's for a little discussion. That was more or less my view of custodial management.
The minister has said, and I'm paraphrasing now, that we already have custodial management within the NAFO agreement. That's what she said. Is she correct? Do we have custodial management within NAFO? And is my version of custodial management too simplistic?
You can be brutal. Go ahead.