The objection procedure wouldn't last two, three, or four years. That would be a dispute settlement process, a separate one. If they objected in October or November when they have the first chance to do it, then there's a 60-day waiting period. A whole bunch of steps are built in. You could probably have a first panel review it and come back with some sort of recommendation to the Fisheries Commission maybe mid-year. There is nothing in there that says how quickly the Fisheries Commission has to deal with it. They can defer it. They can have additional meetings. By the time they come up with a decision there is a further period to object and then a further period to wait. So they can run out the clock for a year. By the end of that year, it's irrelevant whether anybody says anything because the fish would already be gone. In the next year the process just starts over. If they choose to object, the same thing could happen.
One would hope that doesn't happen, but in the past we have had situations where year after year there were objections regardless of the discussions. There was a full discussion. Everybody knew the reasons for the objections; everybody knew why. The one party that objected simply refused to change its position. And there's nothing to change anybody's position in the new agreement.