Let me just clarify my question. What I note is that in addition to your always having a firm respect for the Canadian industry, Canadian shares, you have also fought for conservation. You were an ICNAF commissioner. You were a NAFO commissioner. You were one of the brighter spots in that you actually said that if we don't act on this, we're going to be in trouble. The Canadian industry today came before this committee and said, listen, the main issue for us is just being able to kill that fish and to maintain Canadian shares. They really didn't come here speaking very much about what happens when we need to act for conservation in NAFO, when we actually need to reduce NAFO quotas.
The two-thirds majority appears that it may present a problem in that regard. Gus, is it easier to actually act on conservation with a simple majority, or is it easier to act on conservation with the two-thirds majority required before NAFO can make a decision? Between Gus and Jim, maybe you might be able to jump in there.