Can we talk a little bit about the two-thirds majority, which some have described as providing greater inclusivity to the decision-making process? We've heard contrary testimony to that as well. In fact, there's been some very negative testimony that it might be okay for maintaining share structures, but there's a big question, which I think is the most important question for conservation: what happens when stocks start to decline and then eager, ambitious, and commercially driven interests start wanting either to prevent that or to insert themselves in order to maintain the existing quota structures, in other words, to maintain those shares? Can you describe the implications of that for the committee?
On November 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.