I just want to add one point to that, Mr. Harris, and this opens up a whole other issue—that is, the whole question of science and scientific fisheries management. If Canada were to take on this task, it would have to substantially increase its expenditure on science, because it would be dealing with a much larger area and a much more complex situation. The reality is that Canada is already incurring the lion's share of the expenditures in the management of the continental shelf. I think we are incurring as a country about 70% of the costs. But I would emphasize that, on the question of political will, the political will would include the will to spend the money needed to do this.
If this is going to be an important thing, if this is an important issue for Canada, then we have to be prepared to spend the money, and this will cost money, for us to enforce the 200-mile limit and beyond. For us to patrol the continental shelf, we will need to make expenditures of resources. If we as a country are not prepared to make that commitment, then we are not going to solve this problem. So I think we have to be prepared to recognize that this is not just a matter of political will and extending jurisdiction and recognizing historical shares; it's a matter of putting our money where our mouth is as well.