In my opinion it is. NAFO has taken jurisdiction, which it doesn't have under the Law of the Sea. Under the Law of the Sea agreement these are sedentary species. It's as simple as that.
On November 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On November 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.
November 5th, 2009 / 4:05 p.m.
Retired Public Servant, As an Individual
In my opinion it is. NAFO has taken jurisdiction, which it doesn't have under the Law of the Sea. Under the Law of the Sea agreement these are sedentary species. It's as simple as that.
See context to find out what was said next.