I was thinking in terms of the management inside the 200-mile limit being equivalent to the international management of the Northwest Passage, which Canada claims for itself, but you did touch on something that I want to ask about.
You mentioned respecting historical shares. Is it a difficult concept under custodial management for Canada to say that because this stock has been mismanaged, we are proposing to manage it? I think the concept is that because the international community has failed to do so, Canada would exert a certain custodial management under international law to protect the environment and the sustainability of the species. I think that's where you get in to do something on behalf of the nations.
I take it that it is possible to develop a regime, but do you both have confidence that Canada could in fact supervise a regime that would indeed see the rebuilding of those stocks and ensure that there's a greater biomass of food and protein available for the world community, including Canada? Do you have confidence that we could do that with the right amount of political will and with the scientific knowledge we have at our disposal? Is it doable?